EP
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. (EPD)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was operationally strong but mixed financially: revenue rose to $15.42B while EPS fell to $0.64; Company Adjusted EBITDA was $2.44B, with $2.01B DCF and 1.7x coverage, retaining $842M for reinvestment .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, EPD delivered a revenue beat but an EPS and EBITDA miss: Revenue $15.42B vs $14.00B*, EPS $0.66 actual vs $0.70*, SPGI EBITDA $2.31B vs $2.55B*, driven by PDH downtime and weaker petrochemical spreads offset by record natural gas processing and pipeline volumes .
- Guidance unchanged: 2025 growth capex $4.0–$4.5B, 2026 $2.0–$2.5B; sustaining capex 2025 ~ $525M; leverage target ~3.0x ±0.25x; distribution declared $0.535/unit (annualized $2.14) .
- 2025 catalysts: ~$6B of projects scheduled to enter service (two Permian processing plants, Frac 14, Neches River exports phase 1, Bahia NGL pipeline, Morgan’s Point enhancements), with logistics assets largely contracted (LPG 85–90%)—key de-risking and cash-flow ramp potential .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Record system throughputs: record 7.7 Bcf/d inlet gas processing and 20.3 TBtus/d gas pipeline volumes; NGL pipelines/storage GOM up, natural gas pipelines GOM up, supporting resilient fee-based earnings .
- Cash return capacity intact: DCF $2.01B, 1.7x coverage; $842M DCF retained; buybacks of ~$60M this quarter and payout ratio (LTM) of 56% of Adjusted CFFO .
- Commercial de-risking: exports well contracted; LPG export expansion positioned as highly capital-efficient with competitive fees; management confident growth projects will be “fairly full” at start-up .
- Quote: “We reported record inlet natural gas processing volumes of 7.7 [Bcf/d] and record natural gas pipeline volumes of 20.3 [TBtus/d]” .
-
What Went Wrong
- Petrochemicals softness: Petrochemical & Refined Products GOM fell to $315M (from $444M) on lower octane margins/deficiency revenues and narrower RGP-to-PGP spreads; PDH 1 down ~63 days in Q1 .
- Crude segment softness: Crude Oil Pipelines & Services GOM declined to $374M (from $411M) with lower sales volumes/margins; crude marine terminal volumes fell YoY .
- MTM hedging losses: $42M MTM losses weighed on reported operating income and gross operating margin (vs $4M loss in Q1 2024) .
Financial Results
Income Statement and Cash Metrics
Actual vs S&P Global Consensus – Q1 2025
Note: Company Adjusted EBITDA = $2.444B; SPGI EBITDA actual = $2.313B; definitional differences explain the variance . Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Gross Operating Margin (GOM)
KPIs and Throughput
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “If both PDH plants have been up and running during the first quarter, we would have easily exceeded $2.5 billion [Adjusted EBITDA]” .
- “We have $6 billion of major organic growth projects scheduled to be completed and begin generating cash flow in 2025…” (Frac 14, Neches River exports, Bahia, Morgan’s Point enhancements) .
- On exports/tariffs: “We have not seen a disruption on any of our exports on ethane or LPG… our counterparties are typically international companies who know how to navigate international volatility.” .
- Capital returns and balance sheet: “Payout ratio of adjusted cash flow from operations of 56% [LTM]… leverage 3.1x net… 96% fixed-rate debt” .
Q&A Highlights
- Exports/tariffs: Limited direct exposure to China; trade flows rerouting; terminal expansions highly capital-efficient (e.g., ~$400M capex for ~300 Mbpd) supporting competitive fees .
- 2025 project ramp/contracting: New plants to fill quickly (Midland “close to full,” Delaware 60–75%); exports ~85–90% contracted; multiple supply projects underpin volumes .
- Petrochem outlook: Both PDH units running; splitters moved from margin-based to fee-based lowering volatility; ~75% of octane spread hedged; expect seasonal improvement in 2H spreads .
- Capital allocation: 2026 excess DCF could reach ~$3.6B with growth capex $2.0–$2.5B, leaving ~$1.5B for buybacks/debt paydown (scenario framing) .
- Crude segment run-rate: Q1 softness tied to lower sales volumes/margins; April trends improving; Midland pipes “full,” expect return to crude service later this year .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs consensus: Revenue beat (+$1.42B), EPS miss (-$0.04), SPGI EBITDA miss (-$0.235B), with headwinds from petrochem margins and PDH downtime partially offset by record gas volumes .
- Recent trend: Q4 2024 EPS beat ($0.74 vs $0.71*), revenue in line/slight beat; Q3 2024 EPS beat, revenue slight miss, EBITDA below consensus—highlighting sensitivity of non-fee segments .
Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Consensus Detail (S&P Global)
- Q1 2025: EPS $0.7017*, Revenue $14.00B*, EBITDA $2.548B*, Actuals: EPS $0.658, Revenue $15.417B, SPGI EBITDA $2.313B .
- Q4 2024: EPS $0.7056*, Revenue $14.13B*, EBITDA $2.539B*, Actuals: EPS $0.742, Revenue $14.201B, SPGI EBITDA $2.492B .
- Q3 2024: EPS $0.6518*, Revenue $13.872B*, EBITDA $2.445B*, Actuals: EPS $0.659, Revenue $13.775B, SPGI EBITDA $2.326B .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Fee-based backbone is working: record gas processing/pipeline volumes and higher NGL pipeline/storage GOM offset petrochemical softness—supporting resilient cash coverage and retained DCF .
- Near-term EPS/EBITDA sensitivity remains tied to petrochem spreads and PDH uptime; both PDH units are now running, fee-shift on splitters reduces volatility, and hedges cover ~75% of octane spreads .
- 2025 is an execution year: ~$6B of projects coming online with high contract coverage should expand mid-to-late-2025 cash flows, setting up 2026 capex normalization and higher excess DCF capacity .
- Export optionality remains a strategic moat; tariff developments are being managed via rerouting, with minimal disruption to nominations; brownfield expansions appear cost-advantaged .
- Balance sheet flexibility intact (3.1x net leverage; 96% fixed-rate debt); management reiterates 3.0x ±0.25x target, enabling continued distributions and opportunistic buybacks .
- Watch items: petrochem demand/spreads, PDH reliability, LPG export pricing, ramp cadence of 2025 projects, and Permian activity/well connections (especially 2H weighted) .
- Trading setup: Any evidence of smoother PDH operations and on-time project start-ups could drive estimate revisions higher; conversely, persistent petrochem softness could cap multiple expansion relative to fee-heavy peers .
Footnote: Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Sources: Q1 2025 8-K and press materials ; Q1 2025 earnings call transcript ; Q4 2024 press release ; Q3 2024 press release & call .